There are some additional considerations when conducting peer review activity of apprenticeship programmes, including different types of classroom-based teaching observations. At least one of these reviews will take place annually.
Lesson observation |
In a session observation the observer will attend one session and spend at least 30 minutes observing the teaching, learning and assessment taking place. On this basis they will form a judgement to include feedback on good practice and areas of improvement. At the end of the observed session, feedback will be given to the tutor concerned within 48 hours, with formal written feedback within five days. External and internal observations will take this form. There will be at least one session observation per year depending on judgements reached. Actions from an observation are followed up within 8 weeks. Sessions will be observed within the observation window, with at least 5 working days’ notice. |
. Learning walks |
Learning walks provide a snapshot of the students’ experience and can provide an insight into the normal teaching, learning and assessment practice within an area. During a learning walk, the observer will drop into a number of classes for approximately ten to thirty minutes, in order to observe practice. These observations will not produce a formal audit or written report. Learning walks may be used to investigate a particular theme (e.g. the embedding of equality and diversity or health and safety, induction, learner progress, English and Maths development) or as a means of forming an overview about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in an area (for example as part of an internal quality review). Outcomes from learning walks can then be used to inform professional learning activities or to support the dissemination of good practice. Learning walks are typically unannounced, or conducted with a short notice period. |
Peer review |
Your observations and review will be completed by a peer from within the University. This is a reciprocal process, meaning that you will take it in turns to take the role of the reviewer. Your partner will normally be from outside of your School. Within the partnered dialogue, questions are asked to stimulate reflection and discussion, and where appropriate, to provide each other with feedback and support in action planning and ongoing enhancement. |
Deep Dive |
These are formal observations to validate local judgements and to provide further feedback about performance in the curriculum area. Deep dive observations may lead to additional actions, and initiated according to risk. Deep dive will be announced with notice given at least 5 working days before. Any scheduled learning activity can be observed during this period. |
Cross-university |
Observations may be focussed on a particular theme and will be used to gain an understanding of cross-University strengths and / or areas for improvement in relation to learning, teaching and assessment. the internal observation team will undertake regular standardisation and moderation activity and will also undertake some co-observation with an external observation team each year to allow benchmarking of practice within the wider sector. Observees typically receive up to 5 working days notice. |
In addition,
we ask that a second review is undertaken focussed on one of the following:
As part of teaching on apprenticeships, it is necessary to develop clear lesson plans which helps to structure the teaching session, and may be asked for during regulatory inspections. At the University of Suffolk, there is a standard template which has been developed to ensure that all required components of teaching and the learning experience are covered. You can download the template below, and view an example which illustrates expectations.
The Apprenticeship PRE observation will be undertaken by one of the following, dependent on the area to be reviewed, or learning walk to be undertaken, and following training to be provided by the Head of Quality Enhancement and TEF:
*The Heads of Apprenticeships/Subjects will be allocated 50% of observations outside of their own respective discipline.
Notice of observation would ideally be given, depending on the purpose of the observation. Observers will provide verbal feedback following an observation and a written report will also be produced. Outcomes will be recorded from learning walks and session observations and theses will be categorised by risk alert with outline feedback provided verbally, via email, or both. These comprise (but are not restricted to):
Active learning activities; student-led |
Character strengths | Demonstration and checking of in-session progress | Employability skills |
Enjoyment and attitude towards learning | Equality and Diversity | British Values | Behaviours and Attitudes |
Attendance Levels | Target Session | Lesson Objectives | New Skills, Knowledge and Behaviours |
Progression | Sequential Lesson Planning | Feedback to Students | Quality of Learning |
Quality of Provisions | Personal Development | Behaviour Management | New Learning and Links from Previous Learning |
If the observation is on a one-to-one tutorial, the observee should obtain permission from the student for the observer to be present.
The Quality of Provision |
|
The Quality of Learning |
|
Student Progress |
|
Enjoyment of Learning and Attitudes |
|
Assessment to Support Learning |
|
Equality and Diversity including British Values |
|
Employability Skills including Maths and English |
|
Learner Questions |
|
Themes arising from observations of learning, teaching and assessment will be analysed and used to inform ongoing enhancement work and staff continuing professional development. Observation data and success rates will be compared year on year in order to track improvement and to assess the impact of the observation process in enhancing learner success.
During a co-observation two members of the observation team carry out a simultaneous observation, compare the strengths and areas for improvement observed, together with any suggested actions and agree feedback that will be given to the observee. |
All observers are expected to take part in co-observation activities. This will usually involve being paired with another member of the observation team and we regularly invite external consultants into help validate the accuracy of our observation judgements. |
Co-observations are scheduled centrally. One of the observers will be responsible for producing the observation report and the second will be nominated the moderator. Usually, a senior member of the observation team will act as moderator. |
Both observers attend the session to be observed and complete their reports separately. |
Observers meet and discuss their observations, identifying strengths, areas for improvement and suggested actions, prior to verbal feedback being given. |
If the co-observation is to train or validate a new member of the observation team, they will present their feedback to the moderator first. The moderator will confirm that judgments are accurate. |
The observer will finalise the observation report following the verbal feedback and will release this for the moderator to view prior to releasing it to the observee. |